Handbook 9.4
Investigative Techniques
Chapter 7
Consensual Monitoring
|
|
Contents
|
|
|
-
This chapter contains policy and procedural information concerning the
investigative use of electronic or mechanical monitoring devices with the
consent of one or more parties to conversations. For procedural reasons,
conversations are categorized as either telephone or non-telephone.
-
NOTE:
-
Before any monitoring may take place, there must be no question as to whether
the use of any investigative device is legal under the circumstances.
|
[9.4] 7.2 (06-30-1998)
Consensual Monitoring Defined & Distinguished
|
-
The term Consensual Monitoring, as used herein, means the investigative
interception, overhearing, or recording of a private conversation by the
use of mechanical, electronic, or other devices with the consent of at least
one, but not all, of the participants (as contrasted to Non-Consensual
Monitoring, where no participant consents). Consensual monitoring may be
used in General, Primary, and Subject
Investigations.
-
Supervisory approval is not required for monitoring conversations with the
consent of all parties to the conversation.
-
The monitoring of conversations with the consent of one of the participants
may be used whenever it is both appropriate and necessary to establish a
criminal offense. However, this technique is subject to careful oversight
in order to avoid any unwarranted invasion of privacy or perception of
impropriety.
-
To protect the integrity of all consensual monitoring activities:
-
Recordings must be preserved in their entirety, including information unrelated
to the investigation; and
-
A record of all contacts with the subject of the monitoring request must
be maintained. The record must reflect all contacts with the subject, including
those that were not recorded. An explanation as to why a contact was not
monitored must also be included.
|
[9.4] 7.3 (06-30-1998)
Consensual Monitoring of Telephone Conversations
|
-
This section contains policies and procedures concerning consensual monitoring
of telephone conversations.
|
|
-
Monitoring telephone conversations with the consent of at least one participant
requires the authorization of the Chief, CI. The Director and Deputy Director,
National Operations Division, CI, are also authorized to approve the consensual
monitoring of telephone conversations in all criminal investigations conducted
by IRS, CI (IRM 1229, Delegation Order No. 205). However:
-
The authorization of the Assistant Commissioner, CI, or the Deputy Assistant
Commissioner, CI, is required for consensual monitoring of telephone
conversations where the recording device is to be installed in a place or
manner that will create the risk of an inadvertent prohibited non-consensual
monitoring. The request for approval must contain sufficient information
to apprise the authorizing officials of the need for installing the recording
device in the manner proposed and the precautions that will be taken to prevent
non-consensual monitoring.
-
The approval of the Assistant Commissioner, CI, and the Director, Office
of Enforcement Operations, Criminal Division, Department of Justice (DOJ),
is required for monitoring telephonic conversations when the consenting party
is in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons or the United States Marshal.
-
Form 8041, Request for Authorization to Use Electronic Equipment and Consensual
Monitoring, will be used to request approval. The request should state the
exact days which the authorization is sought, not to exceed 60 days, and
the date the monitoring will begin. In undercover operations, approvals for
up to 90 days may be authorized.
-
When the recording device will be concealed, the request must include an
explanation of the precautions taken to ensure that non-consensual monitoring
will not occur. For example, the monitoring device will be removed or
disconnected after each authorized recording; or the monitoring device and
telephone will be in a secure area with access limited to those individuals
involved in the monitoring. This information should be included in Item 20
on Form 8041.
-
IRM 9.11.3 contains information on the types of equipment that can be used
and specific restrictions and responsibilities regarding the use of
sensitive-type investigative equipment.
-
At the discretion of the approving official, the request may be oral, provided
Form 8041 is submitted at the earliest practical time.
-
Within 15 working days after the completion of the monitoring activities
(or attempted monitoring activities) for each specific authorization, Form
6795, Consensual Monitoring Report, will be submitted to the approving authority.
This report should include a copy of the approved Form 8041. A copy should
be sent through channels, including the District Director, to the Assistant
Commissioner, CI. If no monitoring occurred, the report is due within 15
working days of the authorization's expiration date.
-
In grand jury investigations, the officials approving the monitoring requests
must be added to the grand jury access list.
|
[9.4] 7.4 (06-30-1998)
Consensual Monitoring of Non-Telephone Conversations
|
-
This section contains policies and procedures concerning consensual monitoring
of non-telephone conversations.
|
|
-
Monitoring a non-telephone conversation with the consent of at least one
of the parties requires, in non-emergency situations, the advance written
authorization of one of the following: the Assistant Commissioner, CI; the
Deputy Assistant Commissioner, CI; the Director, National Operations Division,
CI; or the Deputy Director, National Operations Division, CI, in all
investigations except the seven specific sensitive situations described below.
These must be approved by the Director, Office of Enforcement Operations,
Criminal Division, DOJ:
-
The interception relates to an investigation of a member of Congress, a federal
judge or any other federal official holding a position of Executive Level
IV or above, or a person who has served in this capacity in the last two
years.
-
The interception relates to an investigation of any other public official
(local, state and federal) where the offense being investigated involves
bribery, conflict of interest or extortion and relates to the performance
of official duties. Interceptions relative to a criminal tax investigation
do not fall into this category unless the alleged unreported income was received
from a bribe, conflict of interest or extortion and was a result of officials
using their public office to obtain this income; or
-
The interception relates to an investigation of a federal law enforcement
official; or
-
The consenting or nonconsenting person is a member of the diplomatic corp
of a foreign country; or
-
The consenting or nonconsenting person is or has been a member of the Witness
Security Program; or
-
The consenting or nonconsenting person is in the custody of the Bureau of
Prisons or the United States Marshal's Service; or
-
The Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General, Associate Attorney General,
Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division, or the United States
Attorney in the district where an investigation is being conducted has requested
the investigating agency to obtain prior written consent from DOJ.
|
|
-
In an emergency, one of the following procedures should be followed:
-
In all situations where one of the following: the Assistant Commissioner,
CI; the Deputy Assistant Commissioner, CI; the Director, National Operations
Division, CI; or the Deputy Director, National Operations Division, CI, has
approval authority and the emergency needs of an investigation preclude obtaining
written advance approval, they may orally authorize consensual monitoring
of non-telephone conversations. As a general rule, when DOJ approval is otherwise
required, emergency authorization pursuant to this exception will not be
granted where the approving official has in excess of 48 hours to attempt
to obtain written advance approval from DOJ.
-
If one of the following: the Assistant Commissioner, CI; the Deputy Assistant
Commissioner, CI; the Director, National Operations Division, CI; or the
Deputy Director, National Operations Division, CI, grants emergency authorization
for situations otherwise requiring written DOJ approval, the Office of
Enforcement Operations must be notified within 5 working days. The notification
must include an explanation of the emergency and contain all information
required on Form 8041, Request for Authorization to Use Electronic Equipment
and Consensual Monitoring. The authority to grant emergency approval has
been delegated by the Commissioner and cannot be redelegated. Confirmation
of emergency approval will be done by memorandum through channels by one
of the following: the Assistant Commissioner, CI; the Deputy Assistant
Commissioner, CI; the Director, National Operations Division, CI; or the
Deputy Director, National Operations Division, CI.
|
|
-
Form 8041, will be used to request approval. The request should state the
exact days for which the authorization is sought, not to exceed 60 days,
and the date the monitoring will begin. In undercover operations, approvals
for up to 90 days may be authorized.
-
All requests for approval must be submitted by the Chief, CI, through channels
including the District Director and may only be signed by one of the following:
the Assistant Commissioner, CI; the Deputy Assistant Commissioner, CI; the
Director, National Operations Division, CI; or the Deputy Director, National
Operations Division, CI. These officials have been designated by the Commissioner
and the authority cannot be redelegated. (See Delegation Order 205.)
-
NOTE:
-
Oral concurrence for the monitoring must be obtained from a local DOJ attorney
prior to submitting the request. The name and title of the attorney concurring
with the request must be included in Item 20 on Form 8041. When time and
communication facilities are insufficient to complete a written or faxed
request, the needed information may be orally transmitted to the Assistant
Commissioner, CI. An oral request for approval must be confirmed by submitting
a completed Form 8041 within 2 working days after the oral request is made.
|
|
-
When applying for extensions of additional time for the consensual monitoring,
details regarding the need for the extension and the results of the surveillance
during the initial authorized monitoring must be provided. Extension requests
must be initiated and approved prior to the date the original authorization
expires. Otherwise, the extension request must be considered as an original
request.
|
[9.4]
7.4.5 (06-30-1998)
Consensual Monitoring Report(s) Preparation & Submission
|
-
Within 15 working days after the completion of the monitoring activities
(or attempted monitoring activities) for each specific authorization, Form
6795 will be submitted to the Chief, CI, with a copy sent through channels,
including the District Director, to the Assistant Commissioner, CI. This
report should supplement the information contained in the request for
authorization. If no monitoring occurred, the report is due within 15 working
days of the authorization expiration date. If the consensual monitoring involves
a protected witness or a federal prisoner, a copy of the report will be forwarded
by the Assistant Commissioner, CI, to the Director, Office of Enforcement
Operations, DOJ.
-
If a monitoring activity occurs without the appropriate approval or occurs
outside the period authorized on Form 8041, the Chief, CI, will promptly
notify, by telephone, the Director of Investigations of the circumstances
involved, who in turn will promptly notify, by telephone, one of the following:
the Assistant Commissioner, CI; the Deputy Assistant Commissioner, CI; the
Director, National Operations Division, CI; or the Deputy Director, National
Operations Division, CI. Within 5 workdays the Chief, CI, will submit a report
through channels, including the District Director, to the Assistant Commissioner,
CI. This report will set forth all the facts and circumstances surrounding
the incident. The Assistant Commissioner, CI, will review the report and
take appropriate action.
|
|
-
With respect to the participation by special agents with representatives
of one or more other federal agencies that are conducting consensual monitoring
of non-telephone conversations:
-
Special agents will not participate in the consensual monitoring in a passive
or active role unless approval has been obtained for the consensual monitoring
by one of the participating agencies.
-
Special agents may participate in the consensual monitoring in a passive
role without obtaining approval from the Assistant Commissioner, CI.
-
When there is to be active participation or assistance by the special agent
in the consensual monitoring, and where no emergency situation is involved,
the special agent must still obtain the approval of one of the following:
the Assistant Commissioner, CI; the Deputy Assistant Commissioner, CI; the
Director, National Operations Division, CI; or the Deputy Director, National
Operations Division, CI. All such requests must contain a copy of the other
agency's approval for the consensual monitoring.
|
[9.4] 7.5 (06-30-1998)
Safeguarding Records of Consensual Monitoring
|
-
Whenever technically feasible, the conversations overheard (whether telephone
or non-telephone) will be recorded by means of a tape or similar permanent
record. Such tapes or other permanent record of the conversations and any
logs, transcripts, summaries, or memoranda together with copies of all requests
for approval and reports which are submitted to the Assistant Commissioner,
CI, shall be specifically safeguarded from improper disclosure. A record
of individuals who have had access to this material shall be kept and retained
by the custodian of the tape or other permanent record.
|
[9.4] 7.6 (06-30-1998)
Use of Federal Prisoners in Consensual Monitoring Activities
|
-
When requesting the use of federal prisoners in consensual monitoring activities,
the Chief, CI, will prepare a written request which includes:
-
Location of the prisoner
-
Identifying data on the prisoner including Bureau of Prisons register number
-
Necessity of using the prisoner in the investigation
-
Name(s) of target(s) of the investigation
-
Nature of activity requested
-
Security measures to be taken to ensure the prisoner's safety, if necessary
-
Length of time the prisoner will be needed in the activity
-
Whether the prisoner will be needed as a witness
-
Whether a prison redesignation will be necessary upon completion of the activity
-
Whether prisoners will remain in the custody of the investigative agency
or whether they will be unguarded except for security purposes
-
Names of special agents who will be handling the prisoner and their local
telephone numbers
-
This request will be forwarded, through the DI to the Assistant Commissioner,
CI, Attn: Witness Security Coordinator. The Assistant Commissioner, CI, will
promptly transmit the request to the Office of Enforcement Operations, Criminal
Division, DOJ, which will coordinate the request with the Bureau of Prisons.
-
The Bureau of Prisons will advise the Assistant Commissioner, CI, of its
decision which, in turn, will be promptly communicated to the requesting
district.
-
Within 45 days of the conclusion of the activity, the Chief, CI, will forward
a report detailing the results of the activity, through the DI to the Assistant
Commissioner, CI, Attn: Witness Security Coordinator. Reports involving the
use of federal prisoners will be coordinated by the Witness Security Coordinator
with the Director, Office of Disclosure (EX:D), on an
investigation-by-investigation basis, prior to submission to the DOJ Office
of Enforcement Operations. This request will be forwarded through the DI
to the Assistant Commissioner, CI, Attn: Witness Security Coordinator.
-
If the witness or informant is a non-federal prisoner, the advice of District
Counsel should be sought as to the process for securing custody under governing
state law.
-
The United States Marshals Service will be requested to provide assistance
in requests involving federal prisoners due to their responsibility for the
safekeeping of federal prisoners.
-
If such assistance is not provided by the Marshals Service, enough special
agents should be assigned to the custody responsibilities to provide the
constant presence of at least two special agents.
-
A security plan should be developed for the entire period of the temporary
custody of the prisoner to ensure the safekeeping of the prisoner and the
safety of all. This security plan should provide for:
-
A personal search of each prisoner upon each occasion of taking custody.
-
No visits by other persons while the prisoner is in Service custody, unless
such visits facilitate the interrogation.
-
Return of the prisoner to a federally approved custodial facility or the
prisoner's usual place of confinement at the end of each day.
-
Adequate resources for constant, alert guarding of the prisoner if (c) is
not possible.
-
Use of personal physical restraint (handcuffs and leg irons) whenever
appropriate.
-
On extended periods of custody, an appropriate system of communication with
supervisory personnel and periodic status reports to the Chief, CI.
-
All personnel assisting with the custody and interrogation of a prisoner
should be constantly aware that the prisoner's cooperation may be motivated
by the desire to escape from custody.
-
If during the interview it becomes apparent that the prisoner may become
the subject of a criminal investigation, the procedures for interviewing
a person in custody should be followed.
|
[9.4] 7.7 (06-30-1998)
Special Responsibilities for Sensitive Type Investigative Equipment
|
-
Except for those devices described in (3) below, field offices may not purchase,
fabricate, or have manufactured any consensual monitoring equipment or
accessories without approval from the Director, Finance Division, or designee.
Additionally, all equipment obtained with approval will be entered into the
Criminal Investigation Equipment Control System (CIECS) by the acquiring
office.
-
CI field offices may maintain an inventory of induction coils, in-line recording
devices, or similar devices for use when consensual telephone monitoring
is approved. These devices may also be used to record conversations where
all individuals to the conversation consent.
-
Field offices may purchase induction coils, in-line recording devices, or
similar devices locally.
-
Use of personally-owned induction coils, in-line recording devices, or similar
devices is prohibited.
-
Custodial responsibility for each monitoring device will be assigned to the
Headquarters office technical representative. At the request of the Chief,
CI, the Headquarters office technical representative may reassign monitoring
devices to a district technical agent. This agent will maintain a control
record showing the date each monitoring device was released from storage,
to whom it was assigned, and the date it was returned to storage. The monitoring
device will be returned promptly to the designated custodian after its authorized
use.
-
The Assistant Commissioner, CI, will develop and administer programs to ensure
that all employees who operate or install non-telephonic consensual monitoring
equipment and pen registers are adequately trained in the use and installation
of this equipment. These programs should also ensure that these employees
are fully familiar with federal law, Service policy and CI guidelines on
the interception of voice
communications.
-
Only those criminal investigators who have attended training programs in
the use, operation, and installation of this sensitive equipment (except
induction coils, in-line recording devices, or similar devices) will be permitted
to install and operate such equipment unless, in emergency situations, another
individual is specifically authorized to do so by the Chief, CI, or designee.
Training for this type equipment will be conducted with sufficient frequency
to assure that operators and installers of the equipment retain their expertise.
|
|
Internal Revenue Manual
|
Hndbk. 9.4 Chap. 7 Consensual Monitoring
|
(06-30-1998)
|
|
|