Use Case - AR/AP Settlement
Community:
AR/AP entries of the debtor at obligation-time, assuming it was for goods:
Ledger |
TransactionSet |
DebtorCompanyInc |
|
|
TransactionDate |
|
2001/07/21 |
|
|
Account |
Dr/Cr |
Amount |
Party |
Quantity |
ProductOrService |
DueDate |
SettlementMethod |
Purchases |
D |
1100 |
|
5 |
Widgets |
|
|
AP |
C |
-1100 |
CreditorCo |
|
|
2001/07/28 |
SettleAgentA.com |
|
|
|
|
AR/AP entries of the debtor transferring debt to
his settlement agent:
Ledger |
TransactionSet |
DebtorCompanyInc |
|
|
TransactionDate |
|
2001/07/21 |
|
|
Account |
Dr/Cr |
Amount |
Party |
EntryDoc |
DueDate |
SettlementMethod |
AP |
D |
1100 |
CreditorCo |
|
2001/07/28 |
|
AP |
C |
-1100 |
SettleAgentA |
Please
pay CreditorCo, etc., etc.
This constitutes my promissory note,
etc. |
2001/07/28 |
SettleAgentA.com |
|
|
|
|
AR/AP entries of the settlement agent, accepting Debtor's debt:
Ledger |
TransactionSet |
SettleAgentA |
|
|
TransactionDate |
|
2001/07/21 |
|
|
Account |
Dr/Cr |
Amount |
Party |
EntryDoc |
DueDate |
AP |
D |
1100 |
DebtorCompanyInc |
Please
pay CreditorCo, etc., etc.
This constitutes my promissory note,
etc. |
2001/07/28 |
AP |
C |
-1100 |
CreditorCo |
DebtorCompanyInc
owes CreditorCo. |
2001/07/28 |
|
|
|
|
Now the settlement agent goes to a UDDI or ebXML etc. registry or
directly to
CreditorCo and
asks, "Who is your settlement agent? I have a
promissory note from Debtor $1100.00 payable to CreditorCo
."
Electronically and at basically zero cost, SettleAgentA
learns that SettleAgentB handles
paper for CreditorCo.
Settlement agent B agrees to accept it, giving credit to settlement agent A
because perhaps, he has
done some queries in the market and found a path to dispose of somebody elses' liabilities due
and payable to
debtor company. So he bids 99.7% for pricing the paper. SettleAgentA
is in a hurry
and doesn't want to dick around finding another intermediary. You can't
legally advertise
these paper in Canada as they become regulated securities if sold
publicly. And he doesn't
want to dick around with offering the paper on eBAY under a pseudonym, or using Settle'ster
P2P settlement router. Let's say he always charges the spread against
DebtorCo anyway.
So he accepts the 99.7% offer.
AR/AP entries of the settlement agent, relieving himself of Debtor's debt:
Ledger |
TransactionSet |
SettleAgentA |
|
|
TransactionDate |
|
2001/07/28 |
|
|
Account |
Dr/Cr |
Amount |
Party |
EntryDoc |
DueDate |
AP |
D |
1100 |
CreditorCo |
DebtorCompanyInc
owes CreditorCo. |
2001/07/28 |
AP |
C |
-1100 |
SettleAgentB |
DebtorCompanyInc
owes CreditorCo.
This constitutes my promissory note,
etc. |
2001/07/28 |
|
|
|
|
Now at this point SettlementAgentA is finished because his account with SettlementAgentB
either
never closes, because it runs up and down netting lots of paper from lots of
people, or, it can
easily be netted out at very thin discounts to numerous SettlementAgents, with
peering
arrangements in the AR/AP markets.
The standard chart of accounts (arapXML taxonomy
for commerce)
is as follows.
Cash
AR
Inventory
Other Assets
AP
Tax Payable
Other Liabilities
|
Sales
Other Operating Income
COGS (Cost of Goods Sold)
Salaries/Wages
Goods Purchases
Services Purchases
Other Operating Expense
NonOperating Income/Expense
|
Multiparty netting exploration
Person |
Sells |
Buys |
A
B
C
D
|
Food
Shelter
Energy
Transportation
|
Shelter, Energy, Transportation
Food, Energy, Transportation
Food, Shelter, Transportation
Food, Shelter, Energy |
Person A's Expenses for July:
Ledger |
TransactionSet |
PersonA |
|
|
TransactionDate |
|
2001/07/31 |
|
|
Account |
Dr/Cr |
Amount |
Party |
EntryDoc |
DueDate |
SettlementMethod |
AP |
C |
-350 |
PersonB |
PersonA
owes PersonB $750.
This constitutes my promissory note,
etc. |
2001/07/31 |
SettleAgent1 |
AP |
C |
-235 |
PersonC |
PersonA
owes PersonC $235.
This constitutes my promissory note,
etc. |
2001/07/31 |
SettleAgent1 |
AP |
C |
-150 |
PersonD |
PersonA
owes PersonD $150.
This constitutes my promissory note,
etc. |
2001/07/31 |
SettleAgent1 |
Purchases |
D |
350 |
|
PersonB
Food |
|
|
Purchases |
D |
235 |
|
PersonC
Energy |
|
|
Purchases |
D |
150 |
|
PersonD Transportation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that the settlement agent who is in charge of paying
is listed on promissory notes (AP).
Person B's Expenses for July:
Ledger |
TransactionSet |
PersonB |
|
|
TransactionDate |
|
2001/07/31 |
|
|
Account |
Dr/Cr |
Amount |
Party |
EntryDoc |
DueDate |
SettlementMethod |
AP |
C |
-300 |
PersonA |
PersonA
owes PersonB $300.
This constitutes my promissory note,
etc. |
2001/07/31 |
SettleAgent2 |
AP |
C |
-260 |
PersonC |
PersonA
owes PersonC $260.
This constitutes my promissory note,
etc. |
2001/07/31 |
SettleAgent2 |
AP |
C |
-120 |
PersonD |
PersonA
owes PersonD $120.
This constitutes my promissory note,
etc. |
2001/07/31 |
SettleAgent2 |
Purchases |
D |
350 |
|
PersonB
Food |
|
|
Purchases |
D |
235 |
|
PersonC
Energy |
|
|
Purchases |
D |
150 |
|
PersonD Transportation |
|
|
|
|
|
|