South Asia Analysis Group 


Paper no. 305

31. 08. 2001

  

home.jpg (6376 bytes)

 

 

Reassessing Pakistan: the role of two-nation theory- A Book Review

by Dr. S. Chandrasekharan

(Reassessing Pakistan- Anand K. Verma, under the auspices of the Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi, Lancer Publications & Distributors, 2001)

In dealing with Pakistan, many analysts are baffled that Indo Pakistan relations have remained as adversarial as it was from the days of the division of sub continent into two nations.  The massacres on the eve of partition leading to death, destruction and displacement of millions of people across the borders and residual problems relating to partition followed by the war in Kashmir could be the immediate causes for the animosity.  Yet after 53 years one would have expected "the scars and anguishing memories" to ease and normalcy forged in the relationship between the two countries. This has not happened.  While Pakistan maintains that Kashmir is the root cause and that once it is solved there could be no adversarial relationship, it looks that differences are deeper and one should look into the philosophical foundation of the state of Pakistan.

The book "Reassessing Pakistan"- the role of two nation theory by Anand K.Verma examines this issue in detail and comes to the conclusion that many of the internal and external problems, faced by Pakistan today are directly or indirectly the consequences of the artificial two-nation theory practised by its leaders throughout the years of growth till today.  This theory according to the author must rank as one of the "greatest tragedies of human kind."

Mr.Verma has many years behind him in dealing with Pakistan and has been the chief of foreign Intelligence in India for nearly three years.  His study is based on years of experience and should therefore to be taken seriously by political analysts on both sides of the divide to understand the fundamental differences that have emerged over the years.

This book is of topical interest in the light of the failed Agra summit and the expected meetings of the two leaders of India and Pakistan in the coming months.  After reading the book, one cannot but come to the conclusion that the Agra summit would any way have failed despite the media blitz, because of the fundamental and insurmountable differences arising of the two-nation theory practised by Pakistan.  Of late, it has been using the rationale of the theory to move further in forging a fundamentalist Islamic national identity

The book traces the genesis of the trends of the two nation theory, first from the historical perspective when Muslim rule in India for centuries in the last millennium had given the Muslims a feeling of superiority and a perception of belonging to the conquering race.  If the advent of the British rule had put an end to such consciousness, the 1857 mutiny and its aftermath placed Muslims in despairing isolation, depriving the community of the early benefits of the British Period.  Out of this isolation grew the demand for Muslim empowerment which finally resulted in the division of British India into two nations.

If the two nation theory was invented by the Muslim leaders to get back their "lost glory" and taste power with an exclusive territory where the Muslims were in a majority, it suited the British who felt the need for a strategic buffer between the Soviet Union and the soon to be independent India.  What the leaders of Pakistan failed to realise was that the two nation theory had a limited function to create Pakistan and was not to be called into question later when there are a large number of Muslims who remained in India.

It is the view of the author that the two nation theory on which Pakistan was created did not end in 1947 and that it is necessary for India to understand this basic question.  "It continues and will have a fundamental role in all problem solving efforts." (Emphasis ours).  The right lesson to be learnt from Indian experiences of wars of 1965, 1971 and the Lahore declaration of 1999 is the unwillingness of Pakistan to get out of the mind set of the "two nation theory." The experience of Agra summit which occurred after the publication of the book would only confirm this view.

By way of conclusion, the author calls for an introspection in Pakistan over the fundamental assumptions relating to religion, ethos and national security.  These philosophical questions will have to be tackled first by Pakistan leading to positive conclusions before territorial questions could be tackled.  Then could follow a dialogue with the help of friends in the Islamic world, continuation of CBMs  for whatever incremental values that these can achieve and other measures.

The book ends with a grim reminder that unless the fundamental philosophical questions are resolved in Pakistan or progress made, the future scenarios in Indo Pak relations would continue to be bleak.  If stop gap arrangements will be of no avail, can we afford to await generational changes for the ultimate result? Pakistan cannot be wished away and geography and certain historical developments have made us neighbours.  If Pakistan’s adherence to the two nation theory makes Indo Pakistan problems irresolvable, the author suggests that India has to address the theory directly and squarely to get out of the impasse.

The book is written in a lucid manner and easily readable.  The appendices covering the full texts of various agreements between India and Pakistan from Tashkent to Lahore are valuable for reference for researchers.  There is an unusual chapter on the cost of the two nation theory but opinions may differ whether it has helped or adversely affected India.  It is a book which should be read by analysts dealing with Indo Pakistan relations, particularly those from Pakistan as the latter will be in a better position to understand the book and the philosophical questions that have been raised.  This book is specially recommended for study to those analysts of international think tanks who hold the view that once the issues relating to Kashmir are solved, Indo Pakistan relations are bound to improve. 

Some one had remarked that India and Pakistan are from the same womb and yet they have parted ways from the time of their birth! Is there no way to bring them together?

Back to the top

Home  | New  | Papers  | Notes  | Archives  |  Search  | Feedback  | Links

Copyright © South Asia Analysis Group 
All rights reserved. Permission is given to refer this on-line document for use in research papers and articles, provided the source and the author's name  are acknowledged. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes.