South Asia Analysis Group 


Paper no. 328

24. 09. 2001

  

home.jpg (6376 bytes)

 

 

UNITED STATES BLUE-PRINT FOR OPERATION "INFINITE JUSTICE"

by Dr. Subhash Kapila

Operation "Infinite Justice": This is the codename given by the United States to its planned military operations to deal with the first phase of its intended campaigns to eliminate global terrorism.  Operation ‘Infinite Justice’ plans retaliatory military strikes and retributive actions against the Islamic Jehadi perpetrators of the September 11, 2001 devastating attacks in New York and Washington.  The United States has stated officially that it has evidence that these attacks were masterminded and financed by Osama bin Laden and his harbourers, the Taliban regime, are equally culpable of the crime.  Surprisingly, the United States is currently over-looking Pakistan’s complicity as a haven of Osama bin Laden’s activities both in bombings of US embassies in Africa in 1998 and presently too.  With Afghanistan under sanctions, the movement in and out to USA and the West and the communications to Osama’s global network is made possible only by Pakistan.

Operation "Infinite Justice" is an apt codename given by USA, officially, to the military operation.  Reminiscent of India's buckling to minority pressures, the United States is intending to change the name as Muslims have protested that only Allah can dispense ‘Infinite Justice’.

United States Policy Statements: United States policy statements to deal with global terrorism need to be recalled to indicate the background  for Operation Infinite Justice. In brief the United States has maintained, as given out by President Bush in his address to the Joint Session of the US Congress on September 21,2001 that: (1) The Taliban deliver Osama bin Laden and all leaders of the Al Qaeda Islamic Jehad Organisation; (2) Taliban close all terrorist training camps in Afghanistan; (3) Taliban gives inspection access to all terrorist training camps sites; (4) United States war on global terrorism will target all countries that aid, abet or provides havens for terrorism organisations; and (5) US war on global terrorism does not end with Al Qaeda.

Operation Infinite Justice is limited to achievement of the first four American objectives and this paper's discussion is limited to these.

United States Wider Aims of Operation Infinite Justice: United States needs to be complimented for its strategic vision and that is what makes a nation great.  United States has not only thought through in military terms of its impending campaign in Afghanistan, but also thought through as to what has to be done in the post-campaign period.

United States today realises that Afghanistan has been made the nursery of Islamic terrorism, along with camps in Pakistan.  Pakistan achieved this by proxy use of power through the Taliban.  Taliban elimination, therefore is the prime American aim.

In pursuance of this aim, the United States seems to have decided that the restoration of King Zahir to Afghanistan after the elimination of the Taliban, would be a viable alternative.  This is favoured by the Northern Alliance too.  Other than Pakistan, all Islamic countries contiguous to Afghanistan seem to welcome the wider aim of Operation Infinite Justice.

Operation Infinite Justice Military Blue Print - The emerging contours: The emerging contours of this military campaign would not be like the Gulf War where a large number of regular army divisions were required to overcome the Iraqi conventional forces.  It would not be a swift exclusively air bombing campaign like Kosovo. Operation Infinite Justice is expected to be a combination of Air Force and Special Forces operations incorporating airborne operations and heliborne operations, supported by long range naval weaponry like the cruise missiles.

The pattern of ordering strategic assets like the aircraft carrier groups and combat aircraft to the region indicate how this military campaign would proceed.  In terms of ground forces, the formations activated are the Airborne Divisions, the Special Forces and Marines from Okinawa which are assigned for intervention operations in this region.

The Design of Battle: The design of battle for any military campaign hinges on the terrain, the nature and military capabilities of the enemy and more importantly the war aims.

Taking the last factor first, the United States military aims are simple, namely: (1) Eliminate the Taliban from Afghanistan; (2) In the process destroy all Islamic Jehadi terrorist organisations and structures operating from Afghanistan; (3) Restore Afghanistan to a democratic political system and arrange its re-construction with US aid.

The impossible terrain of Afghanistan is no impediment for high mobility air-based US military operations.  More so, when the military aims are simple and limited. Furthermore, when the intended military campaign does not envisage occupation of large tracts of Afghan territory by ground forces requiring heavy logistics to be maintained by roads.

Taliban’s military capabilities and the composition of its regular forces and Islamic militia hardly command military respect.  Their military successes in occupying Afghanistan was made possible and spearheaded by Pakistan Army officers directing their operations and Pakistan’s Regular Army contingents (officially on leave) partaking in Taliban military operations.  With Pakistanis reported to having been ordered back, the fighting capabilities of the Taliban will be limited.  Taliban’s prowess was a myth created by the media.  Taliban has held on to Afghanistan with active involvement of Pakistan in all respects and with primitive Islamic terror as a weapon.  Recall President Musharraf’s statement - what have we not done for Taliban?

Without going into military intricacies, in simple layman terms, the United States design of battle for the Afghanistan campaign can be summed up as: (1) Air strikes against major military and political holds of the Taliban like Kandahar, Kabul Jalalabad and Herat and their associated airfields; (2) Airborne divisions and Special Forces air/helicopter borne operations to establish airheads at the above locations; (3) Flushing out of the Taliban leadership from these locations; (4) Simultaneous cruise missile strikes against all known and suspected Al Qaeda camps in Afghanistan.

Complementing the primary military operations of the United States and possibly as a strategic prelude, the Northern Alliance of Afghanistan forces can be expected to intensify its military advances towards Kabul.  In terms of bases for these operations, the United States has to rely on its Middle East network and its aircraft carriers as platforms.  Uzbekistan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan could provide bases for both United States Air Force, Special Forces and logistics operations.  The prime focus for US military operations should be Kandahar and Kabul.

Pakistan as a Strategic Ally-Doubtful: The above US design of battle for Operation Infinite Justice would have been greatly facilitated in terms of speed, had Pakistan behaved as a strategic ally of the United States as maintained by many in the State Deptt and Pentagon.

Pakistan as a strategic ally of USA should have been expected to launch ground forces advances to Kandahar from Quetta and from Peshawar to Jalalabad.  It should have also been expected to host all US airborne and heliborne operations from its Afghan frontier airfields.  Pakistan has not offered any such assistance except use of its air-space.

Pakistan, therefore, is of limited utility to United States in its efforts to liquidate terrorism. On the contrary, Pakistan’s contributions to USA could be disruptive in many of the following ways: (1) Pakistan’s intelligence on Taliban could be deliberately inaccurate and misleading; (2) Pakistan would not rein in inflow of its Islamic Jehadis into Afghanistan to aid the Taliban; (3) Pakistan could continue surreptiously as a conduit for fuel supplies for the Taliban war effort as they had been doing before in spite of UN sanctions and; (4) Pakistan, and especially its frontier areas, could emerge as the logical refuge for Osama bin Laden.  What would Pakistan do if Osama holes up in one of the Islamic fundamentalists seminaries within Pakistan.

Popular Resistance within Afghanistan to US Military Campaign: The Taliban has held Afghanistan in a vice-like grip of primitive Islamic terror for the last seven years. The general Afghan masses would like to see the end of the Taliban regime and the Pakistani presence.  The United States is unlikely to face any peoples resistance like in Vietnam.

However, the United States and its Special Forces can expect nasty local actions in Kandahar while attempting to gain control.

Conclusion: Even without the tragic incidents of Islamic Jehadi terrorism inflicting grievous wounds on USA homeland proper, there was a higher call on the United States to contain and eliminate global terrorism.  There is no scope for quibbling and it is irrefutable that the prevalent manifestations of global terrorism are Islamic Jehadi terrorism which has targeted both non-Muslims and Muslim countries.  The United States having joined the list of victim states of Islamic Jehadi terrorism, rather too grievously and disproportionately victimised, should demonstrate by actions that it would live up to its resolve to destroy all their networks and go after governments that support them.

President Bush wisely said that in this battle you are either with us or on the terrorist side.  There is no middle ground.  This is also a testing time for the United States to discover its natural allies.

(Dr. Subhash Kapila is an International Relations and Strategic Affairs analyst.  He can be reached on e-mail for discussion at esdecom@vsnl.com)

Back to the top

Home  | New  | Papers  | Notes  | Archives  | Search  | Feedback  | Links

Copyright © South Asia Analysis Group 
All rights reserved. Permission is given to refer this on-line document for use in research papers and articles, provided the source and the author's name  are acknowledged. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes.