[Webfunds-commits] html/guide ricardian.html
Ian Grigg
iang@cypherpunks.ai
Sun, 4 Mar 2001 08:11:26 -0400 (AST)
iang 01/03/04 08:11:26
Modified: guide ricardian.html
Log:
some extra notes
Revision Changes Path
1.4 +15 -5 html/guide/ricardian.html
Index: ricardian.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/webfunds/cvsroot/html/guide/ricardian.html,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4
--- ricardian.html 2001/03/02 21:16:25 1.3
+++ ricardian.html 2001/03/04 12:11:26 1.4
@@ -232,10 +232,12 @@
assets, has not arisen until lately.
</p>
-<h3><a name="alternates">Voucher Trading</a></h3>
+<h3><a name="vouchers">Voucher Trading</a></h3>
+<h4><a name="vouchers_links">Links</a></h4>
+
<p>
-One recent development is the
+One alternate development is the
<a href="http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-trade-voucher-lang-00.txt">
Voucher definition</a>
published by
@@ -290,22 +292,30 @@
</pre>
<p>
-(Ricardo pretty much meets the requirements above.)
+The notion seems to have been introduced as far back as
+this 1998 Usenix paper,
+<a href="http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/ec98/fujimura.html">"General-purpose Digital Ticket Framework"</a>.
</p>
+<h4><a name="vouchers_comments">Commentary</a></h4>
<p>
+Their higher level requirements document for a voucher
+trading system is pretty much met by Ricardo already.
As far as voucher trading goes, the requirements need not be as stringent
as for money or asset systems, but the effective nature of the
system is equivalent. Indeed, the Voucher ID mentions stocks and bonds
at one place, so maybe the system is headed there.
</p>
+<h4><a name="vouchers_comparison">Comparison</a></h4>
+
<p>
In terms of the contrast between Ricardian Contracts
-and Fujimura/Terada Vouchers,
+and Fujimura/Terada Vouchers
+(what this page is more properly about),
there appear to be these :
-
</p>
+
<p></p>
<table border=1>